Objectives: Selective operative management of injuries to the tibial arteries is controversial, with the necessity of revascularization in the face of multiple tibial arteries debated. Tibial artery injuries are frequently encountered in military trauma, but revascularization practices and outcomes are poorly defined. We aimed to investigate associations between the number of injured vessels and reconstruction and limb loss rates in military casualties with tibial arterial trauma.
Methods: A US military database of lower extremity vascular injuries from Iraq and Afghanistan (2004-2012) was queried for limbs sustaining at least one tibial artery injury. Injury and intervention characteristics and limb outcomes were analyzed by the number of tibial arteries injured (one, T1; two, T2; three, T3).
Results: 221 limbs were included (194 T1, 22 T2, 5 T3). The proportions with concomitant venous, orthopaedic, nerve, or proximal arterial injuries were similar between groups. Arterial reconstruction (versus ligation) was performed in 29% of T1, 63% of T2, and universally in T3 limbs (P < 0.001, Figure). Arterial reconstruction was via vein graft (versus localized repair) in 62% of T1, 54% of T2, and 80% of T3 (P=0.59). T3 received greater blood transfusion volume (P=0.02) and fasciotomy was used universally (versus 34% T1 and 14% T2, P=0.05). Amputation rates were 23% for T1, 26% for T2, and 60% for T3 (p=0.16) and amputation was not significantly predicted by arterial ligation in T1 (P=0.08) or T2 (P=0.34) limbs. Infection was more common in T3 (80%) than T1 (25%) or T2 (32%, p=0.02), but other limb complication rates were similar.
Conclusions: In this series of military lower extremity injuries, an increasing number of tibial arteries injured was associated with increasing use of arterial reconstruction. Limbs with all three tibial arteries injured had high rates of complex vascular reconstruction and eventual amputation. Limb loss was not predicted by arterial ligation in one- and two-vessel injuries, suggesting that selective reconstruction in these cases is advisable.
